Building The Right MVP – Balancing Plumbing VS Value
In the previous blogs I discussed specific approaches one
could take to develop product hypotheses, and then get a MVP – Minimum Viable
Product – out in the market to rapidly test and learn from the feedback. This is consistent with the lean product
development framework so you can decide whether to persevere or pivot. There is
one caveat though – when do you decide to pivot, and how do you know that it’s
time to pivot?
It’s an arduous process that product leaders have to go thru
to make the right choices. Lean does not mean less work!
Here is a checklist that may come handy as you prepare to
release your MVP.
1. MVP definition – Strike a balance between
value and plumbing features
In order to make a right choice whether to persevere or
pivot it’s important that the product leaders carefully define MVP by balancing
value and the plumbing that is required for a successful operation of the
product. A poorly designed user experience to install or update the product
(plumbing features) may lead to a negative customer feedback which could,
mistakenly, be interpreted as ‘customer not seeing value in the product’. Product leaders must identify a list of all
the core plumbing features, such as, product installation, updates, remote
diagnostics to analyze a potential cause of product failure, and subscription
management etc. to ensure that these are in place to not only debug field
issues, but to also learn about how customers use the product. It’s important
to strike a right balance between value and plumbing features so that metrics
measurement post MVP is not negatively influenced by poor plumbing. This is
always a hard decision as product leaders must balance between what’s table
stakes and what adds value to the product.
2. Measuring value creation
Consider the following key areas to measure value
creation as outlined in The Blue Ocean Strategy to build your own checklist:
·
Reduce – What pain points are being reduced
significantly more than the industry standard? Example, can your product
identify a mobile security risk in real-time and mitigate?
·
Eliminate – What process steps or redundant
technologies can you eliminate? Example,
can your customers save extra steps to do a secure online commerce transaction?
Can your product eliminate the use of existing/ traditional products and
technologies and still deliver the customer outcomes?
·
Enable – What new capabilities does your product
enable? Example, ability to take pictures from your phone and to share instantly
with your social network.
·
Raise – What value you can raise above industry
norms? Example, IT risk management in real-time.
Metrics
measurement must be designed to capture targeted value creation. This will help
product leaders to make informed decisions about potential improvements needed
to deliver on expected customer outcomes. It will also help decide whether it’s
time to pivot.
3. GTM Checklist:
It’s of
paramount importance that the product leaders pay a great deal of attention to
GTM plans for a MVP so that the feedback and metrics can be interpreted with a
greater degree of accuracy. Absence of a well thought out GTM would lead to
ad-hoc decisions based on the flavor of the day. In such cases, one sample
could lead to a highly inaccurate interpretation resulting into a GTM strategy
that is changing every day. This is something that must be avoided.
GTM plans for
MVP, unfortunately, don’t get the needed attention as, often, the product
leaders are challenged to demonstrate instant success after the release of
MVP. Most of the executives forget the
fact that MVP is still about testing product hypotheses and refining the
product strategy. The temptations to see
a quick economic success of a MVP may prove detrimental to the overall success
of the organization. This temptation, potentially caused by a lack of GTM
planning and a proclivity, caused by strong confirmed biases, for an early
success, soon after the release of MVP, leads to premature spending of expensive
dollars very early on in the product life cycle. In the process, product
leaders are left with less money for a real launch of the product when the
product is truly ready for the prime time.
Here is a simple
checklist that one can use to build a solid GTM plans to test MVP:
1.
Existing customer opportunity – Could you sell
this to the existing customers by enabling key outcomes they care about?
2.
New customer opportunity – What new segment of
the customers would benefit from the product? For example, a company with a
focus on mobile security may look at segments of the market where mobility and
compliance are of prime importance.
4.
Key partners – Who are the key partners that we
need to integrate with in order to deliver expected outcomes? What is the
strategy to establish those relationships?
5.
Key channels – How do you sell your product to
target customers? What’s the channel to
deliver the product to the customers?
6.
Key resources – Do you have needed expertise and
resources to support the GTM model?
7.
Business model – What is your business model?
There are several aspects that the product leaders need to consider. For
example, is the product going to be a platform that would enable collaboration
of several stakeholders and eco system partners to create value for the target
customers? Or, is it going to be a Freemium model, where a set of baseline
features would be available to all, and one pays for the premium options? Calculate
cost and revenues for your business model(s). Validating business model is one
of the key requirements as one takes a MVP to the market.
8.
Key factors that may influence product adoption
– Look for the following key influencers – Technology, Regulatory changes,
Switching costs, Substitute products and services.
A good planning and execution helps product leaders to
manage lean product development process effectively. ‘Lean’ is not a short cut to
success; it helps rapidly build the products that customers want. Success of
lean product development approach requires strong leadership, ability to
evangelize and gain a cross functional alignment, finding a right balance between
plumbing and value features, and establishing a well thought out metrics
measurement to interpret market feedback correctly!